<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Caseexperts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.caseexperts.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.caseexperts.com</link>
	<description>Maximizing the Security Effectiveness of People</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 21:55:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Secure Tracks Article</title>
		<link>http://www.caseexperts.com/secure-tracks-article/</link>
		<comments>http://www.caseexperts.com/secure-tracks-article/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 02:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caseexperts.com/?p=711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following ASLRRA Secure Tracks article appeared in the March 2011 issue. ROUTE RISK ASSESSMENT ONE ROUTE RAILROADS By Ernest R. Frazier Sr. Esq, President and Daniel M. Collins, Consultant, Countermeasures Assessment and Security Experts, Inc. As a result of ASLRRA and FRA discussions held in the fall of calendar year 2010 it became evidently [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>The following ASLRRA Secure Tracks article appeared in the March 2011 issue.</h3>
<p><strong>ROUTE RISK ASSESSMENT ONE ROUTE RAILROADS</strong></p>
<p><strong>By Ernest R. Frazier Sr. Esq, President and Daniel M. Collins, Consultant,<br />
Countermeasures Assessment and Security Experts, Inc.</strong></p>
<p>As a result of ASLRRA and FRA discussions held in the fall of calendar year 2010 it became evidently clear &#8211; the existing Rail Corridor Risk Management System (RCRMS) is not a viable risk assessment tool for short line railroads with only one route. Many of the one route railroads have struggled with RCRMS in an attempt to become compliant with the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration regulation entitled “Enhancing Rail Transportation Safety and Security for Hazardous Materials Shipments” 49 CFR 172.820. In essence RCRMS requires the presence of alternatives routes to make this decision support tool an effective risk assessment methodology.</p>
<p>In recognition of this problem for a segment of our industry, ASLRRA and one of its associate members, Countermeasures Assessments and Security Experts (CASE), approached FRA with an alternative for Class III railroads with only one route. This approach consisted of a template designed by CASE incorporating the 27 Risk Factors within RCRMS, but presented in a fashion more appropriate for railroads possessing only one route. The CASE Team developed a risk assessment tool that for each of the 27 factors, spread risk over the range of high-medium-low-and not appropriate. This categorization of risk is based on CASE’s years of experience in railroad safety and security matters. In addition Case has gained a level of field risk assessment expertise due to the fact that CASE has conducted over 20 vulnerability assessments on short line and regional railroads, where hazardous materials routing is one key risk assessment component. FRA agreed that the use of this template would satisfy the short term requirements of RCRMS for these railroads in analyzing risk over their one and only route.</p>
<p>A template was designed and mailed in November 2010 to ASLRRA member railroads that possess one route and one interchange (42 railroads) and railroads with one route and multiple interchanges (28 railroads). Each of these railroads was asked to fill in the data and when completed, to return a copy to ASLRRA. As of this publication date, the railroads listed below completed the template and were gracious enough to return a copy to ASLRRA.</p>
<p><strong>One Route/One Interchange </strong></p>
<ul>
<li>AN Railway, L.L.C. Company</li>
<li>Central Washington Railroad</li>
<li>Columbia Basin Railroad Co.</li>
<li>Falls Railroad (No TIH)</li>
<li>Florida Central Railroad Co.</li>
<li>New York &amp; Ogdensburg Railway (No TIH)</li>
<li>Ohio Valley Railroad Co. (No TIH)</li>
<li>San Luis Central Railroad Co. (No TIH)</li>
<li>San Pedro &amp; Southwestern Railroad</li>
<li>South Central Tennessee Railroad</li>
<li>Tennessee Southern Railroad Co.</li>
<li>Texas-New Mexico Railroad Company</li>
<li>Valdosta Railway, L.P.</li>
<li>Washington County Railroad Co. (No TIH)</li>
<li>West Texas &amp; Lubbock Railway</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>One Route/Multi</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Allegheny Valley Railroad</li>
<li>Bay Line Railroad, L.L.C.</li>
<li>Blacklands Railroad</li>
<li>Clarendon &amp; Pittsford RR</li>
<li>Copper Basin Railway</li>
<li>Green Mountain Railroad (No TIH)</li>
<li>Iowa Northern Railway Co. (No TIH)</li>
<li>Vermont Railway, Inc.(No TIH)</li>
<li>West Tennessee Railroad Corp.</li>
</ul>
<p>Completed templates continue to arrive weekly. The CASE Team has agreed to analyze the data to assign weights to the 27 different factors based on actual data and as an outcome develop a more permanent solution. Preliminary results already indicate that certain risk fields are indicating higher risk levels such as presence or lack of signals, number of grade crossings and presence or lack of wayside hazard detectors. While this analysis is ongoing, ASLRRA and CASE intend on pursuing grant funding through the soon to be released Freight Rail Security Grant Program (FRSGP) to help fund the development and implementation of a more permanent solution, including digitized features to ease input and to facilitate management decision making. This routing issue will be one component of a much larger effort designed to help a broad cross section of our industry stay compliant with safety and security regulations emanating from both the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and the U.S. Department of Transportation. We will be seeking a railroad to become the grant applicant for this worthwhile undertaking. Any railroad interested in participating please contact Steve Sullivan Sullivan@aslrra.org or Daniel M. Collins at dcollins@caseexperts.com. Finally, those railroads that have returned completed templates, thank you very much. For those still in the process we await your submittals.</p>
<p>Ernest “Ron” Frazier Sr. Esq, is President of Countermeasures Assessment and Security Experts, Inc. (CASE) and former VP and Chief of Police for Amtrak. Daniel M. Collins is a Consultant with CASE and former President of the Operation Respond Institute. They currently serve as Security Advisors to ASLRRA.</p>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow: hidden;">By Ernest R. Frazier Sr. Esq, President and Daniel M. Collins, Consultant,<br />
Countermeasures Assessment and Security Experts, Inc.As a result of ASLRRA and FRA discussions held in the fall of calendar year<br />
2010 it became evidently clear &#8211; the existing Rail Corridor Risk Management<br />
System (RCRMS) is not a viable risk assessment tool for short line railroads<br />
with only one route. Many of the one route railroads have struggled with<br />
RCRMS in an attempt to become compliant with the Pipeline and Hazardous<br />
Materials Safety Administration regulation entitled “Enhancing Rail<br />
Transportation Safety and Security for Hazardous Materials Shipments” 49 CFR<br />
172.820. In essence RCRMS requires the presence of alternatives routes to make<br />
this decision support tool an effective risk assessment methodology.</p>
<p>In recognition of this problem for a segment of our industry, ASLRRA and<br />
one of its associate members, Countermeasures Assessments and Security<br />
Experts (CASE), approached FRA with an alternative for Class III railroads<br />
with only one route. This approach consisted of a template designed by CASE</p>
<p>incorporating the 27 Risk Factors within RCRMS, but presented in a fashion<br />
more appropriate for railroads possessing only one route. The CASE Team<br />
developed a risk assessment tool that for each of the 27 factors, spread risk over<br />
the range of high-medium-low-and not appropriate. This categorization of risk is<br />
based on CASE’s years of experience in railroad safety and security matters. In<br />
addition Case has gained a level of field risk assessment expertise due to the fact<br />
that CASE has conducted over 20 vulnerability assessments on short line and<br />
regional railroads, where hazardous materials routing is one key risk assessment<br />
component. FRA agreed that the use of this template would satisfy the short<br />
term requirements of RCRMS for these railroads in analyzing risk over their one<br />
and only route.</p>
<p>A template was designed and mailed in November 2010 to ASLRRA member<br />
railroads that possess one route and one interchange (42 railroads) and railroads<br />
with one route and multiple interchanges (28 railroads). Each of these railroads<br />
was asked to fill in the data and when completed, to return a copy to ASLRRA.<br />
As of this publication date, the railroads listed below completed the template and<br />
were gracious enough to return a copy to ASLRRA.</p>
<p>One Route/One Interchange<br />
Interchange</p>
<p>AN Railway, L.L.C.<br />
Company</p>
<p>Central Washington Railroad</p>
<p>Columbia Basin Railroad Co.</p>
<p>Falls Railroad (No TIH)<br />
(No TIH)</p>
<p>Florida Central Railroad Co.</p>
<p>New York &amp; Ogdensburg Railway (No TIH)Green Mountain Railroad (No TIH)</p>
<p>Ohio Valley Railroad Co. (No TIH)<br />
TIH)</p>
<p>San Luis Central Railroad Co.<br />
TIH)</p>
<p>San Pedro &amp; Southwestern Railroad</p>
<p>South Central Tennessee Railroad</p>
<p>Tennessee Southern Railroad Co.</p>
<p>Texas-New Mexico Railroad Company</p>
<p>Valdosta Railway, L.P.</p>
<p>Washington County Railroad Co. (No TIH)</p>
<p>West Texas &amp; Lubbock Railway</p>
<p>Completed templates continue to arrive weekly. The CASE Team has agreed to<br />
analyze the data to assign weights to the 27 different factors based on actual data<br />
and as an outcome develop a more permanent solution. Preliminary results<br />
already indicate that certain risk fields are indicating higher risk levels such as<br />
presence or lack of signals, number of grade crossings and presence or lack of<br />
wayside hazard detectors. While this analysis is ongoing, ASLRRA and CASE<br />
intend on pursuing grant funding through the soon to be released Freight Rail<br />
Security Grant Program (FRSGP) to help fund the development and<br />
implementation of a more permanent solution, including digitized features to<br />
ease input and to facilitate management decision making. This routing issue will<br />
be one component of a much larger effort designed to help a broad cross section<br />
of our industry stay compliant with safety and security regulations emanating<br />
from both the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and the U.S. Department<br />
of Transportation. We will be seeking a railroad to become the grant applicant<br />
for this worthwhile undertaking. Any railroad interested in participating please<br />
contact Steve Sullivan Sullivan@aslrra.org or Daniel M. Collins at<br />
dcollins@caseexperts.com. Finally, those railroads that have returned completed<br />
templates, thank you very much. For those still in the process we await your<br />
submittals.</p>
<p>Ernest “Ron” Frazier Sr. Esq, is President of Countermeasures Assessment and<br />
Security Experts, Inc. (CASE) and former VP nd Chief of Police for Amtrak.<br />
Daniel M. Collins is a Consultant with CASE and former President of the<br />
Operation Respond Institute. They currently serve as Security Advisors to<br />
ASLRRA.</p>
<p>OPERATIONS &amp; SAFETY BREAKOUT TRACK TOPICS:</p>
<p>Check out the great educational sessions that have been planned for the<br />
Operations and Safety Track at the upcoming Annual Convention.</p>
<p>Track 601: Keep ‘Em Safe – Installing Traffic Safety Devices While<br />
Working at Highway-Rail Grade Crossings Can Save Lives</p>
<p>National statistics indicate there is a strong prevalence of serious injuries and<br />
fatalities for personnel working on or adjacent to highways. M-O-W and Signal<br />
personnel often perform work at highway-rail grade crossings and knowing the<br />
proper application of warning devices can help reduce the risk of an accident.<br />
Learn how installing adequate signage and traffic diversion devices is important<br />
to minimize the risk of injuries and incidents.</p>
<p>Track 602: Lessons Learned: Putting the Research in Fatigue Management<br />
to Work in the Small Railroad Industry</p>
<p>Alertness and fatigue among railroad workers has been a growing area of<br />
concern given recent regulatory action and the industry’s desire to support an<br />
alert workforce. Extensive research has been performed in the rail industry<br />
regarding alertness/fatigue, but much of this work has been performed with<br />
Class I railroads. Sharing lessons learned from such research and how it can<br />
be applied to ASLRRA members can be important to effectively address this<br />
matter. Dr. Pat Sherry has worked with the rail industry for over 15 years and<br />
has been intimately involved in performing research on fatigue/alertness. Dr.<br />
Sherry is assisting the ASLRRA on fatigue countermeasure initiatives and will<br />
share his expertise in this important area.&#8221;</p>
<p>Track 603: An Overview of FRA Accident/Incident Reporting Changes:<br />
What You Don’t Do, Can Cost You</p>
<p>New FRA Accident/Incident Reporting Regulations are going into effect. A<br />
clear understanding of these regulations is important to ensure data is accurately<br />
recorded and to achieve full compliance with the regulation, a key responsibility<br />
of ASLRRA member railroads. This course will cover key information all<br />
reporting officers need to know.</p>
<p>Track 604: Behavioral Based Safety: A Good Fit for Short Lines</p>
<p>Behavioral Based Safety (BBS) is a proven approach to improving safety that<br />
is frequently used in general industry and over the last several years is being<br />
implemented on some Class I railroads. It is a powerful approach to enhance<br />
safety that while not well known in the small railroad industry, it fits well with<br />
the more relational-based approach to safety that is common practice on short<br />
lines. This method supports greater employee ownership and responsibility for<br />
safety. Through measurement, targeting countermeasures at identified unsafe<br />
work practices, peer intervention and tracking of performance the prevalence of<br />
safe work practices are increased. Learn about the principles of BBS and how<br />
it is being implemented on a short line railroad and see if it will work for your</p>
<p>railroad.&#8221;</p>
<p>Track 605: Conductor Certification: A Review of the Regulation and Q&amp;A<br />
RR101</p>
<p>The FRA has issued a new regulation that will require that all conductors go<br />
through a certification process. This new regulation will require railroads to<br />
develop a certification program, adjust their training process and document<br />
the process in more detail. Participants will be provided the model ASLRRA –<br />
Conductor Certification Program and the presenter will explain the regulatory<br />
requirements and respond to participant questions.</p>
<p>Track 606: Prompt and Appropriate Response to Accidents &amp; Incidents –<br />
It Could Be Critical to Your Railroad’s Survival</p>
<p>Prompt and appropriate response to accidents and incidents is critical to care of<br />
employees and effective management of risk. Railroads face significant levels of<br />
liability due to accidents/incidents and the proper response may be critical to the<br />
survival of the railroad. Crossing collisions, train accidents and personal injuries<br />
require a prompt response to ensure proper care for any injured individuals and<br />
to effectively manage potential risk to the railroad. This presentation will offer<br />
best practice information and guidance on response to such situations.&#8221;</p>
<p>Note to ASLRRA Members: This is a quarterly publication for ASLRRA<br />
members highlighting a timely security or police issue of importance to the small<br />
railroad industry in a concise, readable format. Sponsored by the ASLRRA’s<br />
Police &amp; Security Committee, the publication is distributed via email to keep<br />
ASLRRA members up to date on developments that impact their businesses.<br />
ASLRRA members can view prior issues online by visiting the Documents<br />
section on ASLRRA’s Members’ Only website at: http://members.aslrra.org</p>
<p>Questions or comments about this publication? Please contact:</p>
<p>Steve Sullivan<br />
Vice President &amp; Executive Director</p>
<p>sullivan@aslrra.org</p>
<p>American Short Line and Regional Railroad Association</p>
<p>50 F St., NW, Suite 7020</p>
<p>Washington, DC 20001</p>
<p>202-628-4500</p>
<p>www.aslrra.orgBy Ernest R. Frazier Sr. Esq, President and Daniel M. Collins, Consultant,</p>
<p>Countermeasures Assessment and Security Experts, Inc.</p>
<p>As a result of ASLRRA and FRA discussions held in the fall of calendar year</p>
<p>2010 it became evidently clear &#8211; the existing Rail Corridor Risk Management</p>
<p>System (RCRMS) is not a viable risk assessment tool for short line railroads</p>
<p>with only one route. Many of the one route railroads have struggled with</p>
<p>RCRMS in an attempt to become compliant with the Pipeline and Hazardous</p>
<p>Materials Safety Administration regulation entitled “Enhancing Rail</p>
<p>Transportation Safety and Security for Hazardous Materials Shipments” 49 CFR</p>
<p>172.820. In essence RCRMS requires the presence of alternatives routes to make</p>
<p>this decision support tool an effective risk assessment methodology.</p>
<p>In recognition of this problem for a segment of our industry, ASLRRA and</p>
<p>one of its associate members, Countermeasures Assessments and Security</p>
<p>Experts (CASE), approached FRA with an alternative for Class III railroads</p>
<p>with only one route. This approach consisted of a template designed by CASE</p>
<p>incorporating the 27 Risk Factors within RCRMS, but presented in a fashion</p>
<p>more appropriate for railroads possessing only one route. The CASE Team</p>
<p>developed a risk assessment tool that for each of the 27 factors, spread risk over</p>
<p>the range of high-medium-low-and not appropriate. This categorization of risk is</p>
<p>based on CASE’s years of experience in railroad safety and security matters. In</p>
<p>addition Case has gained a level of field risk assessment expertise due to the fact</p>
<p>that CASE has conducted over 20 vulnerability assessments on short line and</p>
<p>regional railroads, where hazardous materials routing is one key risk assessment</p>
<p>component. FRA agreed that the use of this template would satisfy the short</p>
<p>term requirements of RCRMS for these railroads in analyzing risk over their one</p>
<p>and only route.</p>
<p>A template was designed and mailed in November 2010 to ASLRRA member</p>
<p>railroads that possess one route and one interchange (42 railroads) and railroads</p>
<p>with one route and multiple interchanges (28 railroads). Each of these railroads</p>
<p>was asked to fill in the data and when completed, to return a copy to ASLRRA.</p>
<p>As of this publication date, the railroads listed below completed the template and</p>
<p>were gracious enough to return a copy to ASLRRA.</p>
<p>One Route/One Interchange</p>
<p>Interchange</p>
<p>AN Railway, L.L.C.</p>
<p>Company</p>
<p>Central Washington Railroad</p>
<p>Columbia Basin Railroad Co.</p>
<p>Falls Railroad (No TIH)</p>
<p>(No TIH)</p>
<p>Florida Central Railroad Co.</p>
<p>New York &amp; Ogdensburg Railway (No TIH)Green Mountain Railroad (No TIH)</p>
<p>Ohio Valley Railroad Co. (No TIH)</p>
<p>TIH)</p>
<p>San Luis Central Railroad Co.</p>
<p>TIH)</p>
<p>San Pedro &amp; Southwestern Railroad</p>
<p>South Central Tennessee Railroad</p>
<p>Tennessee Southern Railroad Co.</p>
<p>Texas-New Mexico Railroad Company</p>
<p>Valdosta Railway, L.P.</p>
<p>Washington County Railroad Co. (No TIH)</p>
<p>West Texas &amp; Lubbock Railway</p>
<p>Completed templates continue to arrive weekly. The CASE Team has agreed to</p>
<p>analyze the data to assign weights to the 27 different factors based on actual data</p>
<p>and as an outcome develop a more permanent solution. Preliminary results</p>
<p>already indicate that certain risk fields are indicating higher risk levels such as</p>
<p>presence or lack of signals, number of grade crossings and presence or lack of</p>
<p>wayside hazard detectors. While this analysis is ongoing, ASLRRA and CASE</p>
<p>intend on pursuing grant funding through the soon to be released Freight Rail</p>
<p>Security Grant Program (FRSGP) to help fund the development and</p>
<p>implementation of a more permanent solution, including digitized features to</p>
<p>ease input and to facilitate management decision making. This routing issue will</p>
<p>be one component of a much larger effort designed to help a broad cross section</p>
<p>of our industry stay compliant with safety and security regulations emanating</p>
<p>from both the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and the U.S. Department</p>
<p>of Transportation. We will be seeking a railroad to become the grant applicant</p>
<p>for this worthwhile undertaking. Any railroad interested in participating please</p>
<p>contact Steve Sullivan Sullivan@aslrra.org or Daniel M. Collins at</p>
<p>dcollins@caseexperts.com. Finally, those railroads that have returned completed</p>
<p>templates, thank you very much. For those still in the process we await your</p>
<p>submittals.</p>
<p>Ernest “Ron” Frazier Sr. Esq, is President of Countermeasures Assessment and</p>
<p>Security Experts, Inc. (CASE) and former VP nd Chief of Police for Amtrak.</p>
<p>Daniel M. Collins is a Consultant with CASE and former President of the</p>
<p>Operation Respond Institute. They currently serve as Security Advisors to</p>
<p>ASLRRA.</p>
<p>OPERATIONS &amp; SAFETY BREAKOUT TRACK TOPICS:</p>
<p>Check out the great educational sessions that have been planned for the</p>
<p>Operations and Safety Track at the upcoming Annual Convention.</p>
<p>Track 601: Keep ‘Em Safe – Installing Traffic Safety Devices While</p>
<p>Working at Highway-Rail Grade Crossings Can Save Lives</p>
<p>National statistics indicate there is a strong prevalence of serious injuries and</p>
<p>fatalities for personnel working on or adjacent to highways. M-O-W and Signal</p>
<p>personnel often perform work at highway-rail grade crossings and knowing the</p>
<p>proper application of warning devices can help reduce the risk of an accident.</p>
<p>Learn how installing adequate signage and traffic diversion devices is important</p>
<p>to minimize the risk of injuries and incidents.</p>
<p>Track 602: Lessons Learned: Putting the Research in Fatigue Management</p>
<p>to Work in the Small Railroad Industry</p>
<p>Alertness and fatigue among railroad workers has been a growing area of</p>
<p>concern given recent regulatory action and the industry’s desire to support an</p>
<p>alert workforce. Extensive research has been performed in the rail industry</p>
<p>regarding alertness/fatigue, but much of this work has been performed with</p>
<p>Class I railroads. Sharing lessons learned from such research and how it can</p>
<p>be applied to ASLRRA members can be important to effectively address this</p>
<p>matter. Dr. Pat Sherry has worked with the rail industry for over 15 years and</p>
<p>has been intimately involved in performing research on fatigue/alertness. Dr.</p>
<p>Sherry is assisting the ASLRRA on fatigue countermeasure initiatives and will</p>
<p>share his expertise in this important area.&#8221;</p>
<p>Track 603: An Overview of FRA Accident/Incident Reporting Changes:</p>
<p>What You Don’t Do, Can Cost You</p>
<p>New FRA Accident/Incident Reporting Regulations are going into effect. A</p>
<p>clear understanding of these regulations is important to ensure data is accurately</p>
<p>recorded and to achieve full compliance with the regulation, a key responsibility</p>
<p>of ASLRRA member railroads. This course will cover key information all</p>
<p>reporting officers need to know.</p>
<p>Track 604: Behavioral Based Safety: A Good Fit for Short Lines</p>
<p>Behavioral Based Safety (BBS) is a proven approach to improving safety that</p>
<p>is frequently used in general industry and over the last several years is being</p>
<p>implemented on some Class I railroads. It is a powerful approach to enhance</p>
<p>safety that while not well known in the small railroad industry, it fits well with</p>
<p>the more relational-based approach to safety that is common practice on short</p>
<p>lines. This method supports greater employee ownership and responsibility for</p>
<p>safety. Through measurement, targeting countermeasures at identified unsafe</p>
<p>work practices, peer intervention and tracking of performance the prevalence of</p>
<p>safe work practices are increased. Learn about the principles of BBS and how</p>
<p>it is being implemented on a short line railroad and see if it will work for your</p>
<p>railroad.&#8221;</p>
<p>Track 605: Conductor Certification: A Review of the Regulation and Q&amp;A</p>
<p>RR101</p>
<p>The FRA has issued a new regulation that will require that all conductors go</p>
<p>through a certification process. This new regulation will require railroads to</p>
<p>develop a certification program, adjust their training process and document</p>
<p>the process in more detail. Participants will be provided the model ASLRRA –</p>
<p>Conductor Certification Program and the presenter will explain the regulatory</p>
<p>requirements and respond to participant questions.</p>
<p>Track 606: Prompt and Appropriate Response to Accidents &amp; Incidents –</p>
<p>It Could Be Critical to Your Railroad’s Survival</p>
<p>Prompt and appropriate response to accidents and incidents is critical to care of</p>
<p>employees and effective management of risk. Railroads face significant levels of</p>
<p>liability due to accidents/incidents and the proper response may be critical to the</p>
<p>survival of the railroad. Crossing collisions, train accidents and personal injuries</p>
<p>require a prompt response to ensure proper care for any injured individuals and</p>
<p>to effectively manage potential risk to the railroad. This presentation will offer</p>
<p>best practice information and guidance on response to such situations.&#8221;</p>
<p>Note to ASLRRA Members: This is a quarterly publication for ASLRRA</p>
<p>members highlighting a timely security or police issue of importance to the small</p>
<p>railroad industry in a concise, readable format. Sponsored by the ASLRRA’s</p>
<p>Police &amp; Security Committee, the publication is distributed via email to keep</p>
<p>ASLRRA members up to date on developments that impact their businesses.</p>
<p>ASLRRA members can view prior issues online by visiting the Documents</p>
<p>section on ASLRRA’s Members’ Only website at: http://members.aslrra.org</p>
<p>Questions or comments about this publication? Please contact:</p>
<p>Steve Sullivan</p>
<p>Vice President &amp; Executive Director</p>
<p>sullivan@aslrra.org</p>
<p>American Short Line and Regional Railroad Association</p>
<p>50 F St., NW, Suite 7020</p>
<p>Washington, DC 20001</p>
<p>202-628-4500</p>
<p>www.aslrra.org</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.caseexperts.com/secure-tracks-article/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New CASE Client: the United Transportation Union</title>
		<link>http://www.caseexperts.com/new-case-client-the-united-transportation-union/</link>
		<comments>http://www.caseexperts.com/new-case-client-the-united-transportation-union/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2011 23:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caseexperts.com/?p=682</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[March 2011, United Transportation Union signed a contract with CASE to provide security and emergency response related course development services to front-line employees of AMTRAK.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>March 2011, United Transportation Union signed a contract with CASE to provide security and emergency response related course development services to front-line employees of AMTRAK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.caseexperts.com/new-case-client-the-united-transportation-union/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Freight Rail Security Grant Program (FRSGP)</title>
		<link>http://www.caseexperts.com/freight-rail-security-grant-program-frsgp/</link>
		<comments>http://www.caseexperts.com/freight-rail-security-grant-program-frsgp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2011 23:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caseexperts.com/?p=675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The FRSGP funds freight railroad carriers and owners and offerors of railroad cars to protect critical surface transportation infrastructure from acts of terrorism, major disasters, and other emergencies. Read more..FEMA.GOV]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-676" style="margin-left: 20px; margin-right: 20px; border: 1px solid black;" src="http://caseexperts.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/frsgp.jpg" alt="" width="117" height="92" />The <a href="http://www.fema.gov/government/grant/frsgp/index.shtm">FRSGP</a> funds freight railroad carriers and owners and offerors of railroad cars to protect critical surface transportation infrastructure from acts of terrorism, major disasters, and other emergencies.</p>
<p>Read more..<a href="http://fema.gov">FEMA.GOV</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.caseexperts.com/freight-rail-security-grant-program-frsgp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intercity Bus Security Grant Program (IBSGP)</title>
		<link>http://www.caseexperts.com/intercity-bus-security-grant-program-ibsgp/</link>
		<comments>http://www.caseexperts.com/intercity-bus-security-grant-program-ibsgp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2011 23:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caseexperts.com/?p=672</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Purpose: The purpose of the IBSGP is to provide funding to create a sustainable program for the protection of intercity bus systems and the traveling public from terrorism. The program seeks to assist operators of fixed route intercity and charter bus services in obtaining the resources required to support security measures such as enhanced planning, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-673" style="margin-left: 20px; margin-right: 20px; border: 1px solid black;" src="http://caseexperts.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/intercity.jpg" alt="" width="118" height="76" />Purpose: The purpose of the IBSGP is to provide funding to create a sustainable program for the protection of intercity bus systems and the traveling public from terrorism. The program seeks to assist operators of fixed route intercity and charter bus services in obtaining the resources required to support security measures such as enhanced planning, facility security upgrades, and vehicle and driver protection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.caseexperts.com/intercity-bus-security-grant-program-ibsgp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Testimonials</title>
		<link>http://www.caseexperts.com/testimonials/</link>
		<comments>http://www.caseexperts.com/testimonials/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 15:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caseexperts.com/?p=353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CASE Testimonials &#8220;The CASE team did a great job assisting us through the process.  Their consultant&#8217;s knowledge of homeland security and their experience in the railroad industry made all the difference.&#8221; Rob Olszowka Chief IHB Railroad Police &#8220;Our Security Plan Document is user friendly and was specifically developed by CASE for our railroad.&#8221; George Muraski [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><span style="color: #4e81d4;">CASE Testimonials</span></strong><em></em></p>
<p><em>&#8220;The  CASE team did a great job assisting us through the process.  Their  consultant&#8217;s knowledge of homeland security and their experience in the  railroad industry made all the difference.&#8221;</em> Rob Olszowka Chief IHB Railroad Police<em></p>
<p>&#8220;Our Security Plan Document is user friendly and was specifically developed by CASE for our railroad.&#8221; </em><br />
George Muraski  Chief TRRA Railroad Police.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.caseexperts.com/testimonials/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

