The following ASLRRA Secure Tracks article appeared in the March 2011 issue.
ROUTE RISK ASSESSMENT ONE ROUTE RAILROADS
By Ernest R. Frazier Sr. Esq, President and Daniel M. Collins, Consultant,
Countermeasures Assessment and Security Experts, Inc.
As a result of ASLRRA and FRA discussions held in the fall of calendar year 2010 it became evidently clear – the existing Rail Corridor Risk Management System (RCRMS) is not a viable risk assessment tool for short line railroads with only one route. Many of the one route railroads have struggled with RCRMS in an attempt to become compliant with the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration regulation entitled “Enhancing Rail Transportation Safety and Security for Hazardous Materials Shipments” 49 CFR 172.820. In essence RCRMS requires the presence of alternatives routes to make this decision support tool an effective risk assessment methodology.
In recognition of this problem for a segment of our industry, ASLRRA and one of its associate members, Countermeasures Assessments and Security Experts (CASE), approached FRA with an alternative for Class III railroads with only one route. This approach consisted of a template designed by CASE incorporating the 27 Risk Factors within RCRMS, but presented in a fashion more appropriate for railroads possessing only one route. The CASE Team developed a risk assessment tool that for each of the 27 factors, spread risk over the range of high-medium-low-and not appropriate. This categorization of risk is based on CASE’s years of experience in railroad safety and security matters. In addition Case has gained a level of field risk assessment expertise due to the fact that CASE has conducted over 20 vulnerability assessments on short line and regional railroads, where hazardous materials routing is one key risk assessment component. FRA agreed that the use of this template would satisfy the short term requirements of RCRMS for these railroads in analyzing risk over their one and only route.
A template was designed and mailed in November 2010 to ASLRRA member railroads that possess one route and one interchange (42 railroads) and railroads with one route and multiple interchanges (28 railroads). Each of these railroads was asked to fill in the data and when completed, to return a copy to ASLRRA. As of this publication date, the railroads listed below completed the template and were gracious enough to return a copy to ASLRRA.
One Route/One Interchange
- AN Railway, L.L.C. Company
- Central Washington Railroad
- Columbia Basin Railroad Co.
- Falls Railroad (No TIH)
- Florida Central Railroad Co.
- New York & Ogdensburg Railway (No TIH)
- Ohio Valley Railroad Co. (No TIH)
- San Luis Central Railroad Co. (No TIH)
- San Pedro & Southwestern Railroad
- South Central Tennessee Railroad
- Tennessee Southern Railroad Co.
- Texas-New Mexico Railroad Company
- Valdosta Railway, L.P.
- Washington County Railroad Co. (No TIH)
- West Texas & Lubbock Railway
One Route/Multi
- Allegheny Valley Railroad
- Bay Line Railroad, L.L.C.
- Blacklands Railroad
- Clarendon & Pittsford RR
- Copper Basin Railway
- Green Mountain Railroad (No TIH)
- Iowa Northern Railway Co. (No TIH)
- Vermont Railway, Inc.(No TIH)
- West Tennessee Railroad Corp.
Completed templates continue to arrive weekly. The CASE Team has agreed to analyze the data to assign weights to the 27 different factors based on actual data and as an outcome develop a more permanent solution. Preliminary results already indicate that certain risk fields are indicating higher risk levels such as presence or lack of signals, number of grade crossings and presence or lack of wayside hazard detectors. While this analysis is ongoing, ASLRRA and CASE intend on pursuing grant funding through the soon to be released Freight Rail Security Grant Program (FRSGP) to help fund the development and implementation of a more permanent solution, including digitized features to ease input and to facilitate management decision making. This routing issue will be one component of a much larger effort designed to help a broad cross section of our industry stay compliant with safety and security regulations emanating from both the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and the U.S. Department of Transportation. We will be seeking a railroad to become the grant applicant for this worthwhile undertaking. Any railroad interested in participating please contact Steve Sullivan Sullivan@aslrra.org or Daniel M. Collins at dcollins@caseexperts.com. Finally, those railroads that have returned completed templates, thank you very much. For those still in the process we await your submittals.
Ernest “Ron” Frazier Sr. Esq, is President of Countermeasures Assessment and Security Experts, Inc. (CASE) and former VP and Chief of Police for Amtrak. Daniel M. Collins is a Consultant with CASE and former President of the Operation Respond Institute. They currently serve as Security Advisors to ASLRRA.
Countermeasures Assessment and Security Experts, Inc.As a result of ASLRRA and FRA discussions held in the fall of calendar year
2010 it became evidently clear – the existing Rail Corridor Risk Management
System (RCRMS) is not a viable risk assessment tool for short line railroads
with only one route. Many of the one route railroads have struggled with
RCRMS in an attempt to become compliant with the Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration regulation entitled “Enhancing Rail
Transportation Safety and Security for Hazardous Materials Shipments” 49 CFR
172.820. In essence RCRMS requires the presence of alternatives routes to make
this decision support tool an effective risk assessment methodology.
In recognition of this problem for a segment of our industry, ASLRRA and
one of its associate members, Countermeasures Assessments and Security
Experts (CASE), approached FRA with an alternative for Class III railroads
with only one route. This approach consisted of a template designed by CASE
incorporating the 27 Risk Factors within RCRMS, but presented in a fashion
more appropriate for railroads possessing only one route. The CASE Team
developed a risk assessment tool that for each of the 27 factors, spread risk over
the range of high-medium-low-and not appropriate. This categorization of risk is
based on CASE’s years of experience in railroad safety and security matters. In
addition Case has gained a level of field risk assessment expertise due to the fact
that CASE has conducted over 20 vulnerability assessments on short line and
regional railroads, where hazardous materials routing is one key risk assessment
component. FRA agreed that the use of this template would satisfy the short
term requirements of RCRMS for these railroads in analyzing risk over their one
and only route.
A template was designed and mailed in November 2010 to ASLRRA member
railroads that possess one route and one interchange (42 railroads) and railroads
with one route and multiple interchanges (28 railroads). Each of these railroads
was asked to fill in the data and when completed, to return a copy to ASLRRA.
As of this publication date, the railroads listed below completed the template and
were gracious enough to return a copy to ASLRRA.
One Route/One Interchange
Interchange
AN Railway, L.L.C.
Company
Central Washington Railroad
Columbia Basin Railroad Co.
Falls Railroad (No TIH)
(No TIH)
Florida Central Railroad Co.
New York & Ogdensburg Railway (No TIH)Green Mountain Railroad (No TIH)
Ohio Valley Railroad Co. (No TIH)
TIH)
San Luis Central Railroad Co.
TIH)
San Pedro & Southwestern Railroad
South Central Tennessee Railroad
Tennessee Southern Railroad Co.
Texas-New Mexico Railroad Company
Valdosta Railway, L.P.
Washington County Railroad Co. (No TIH)
West Texas & Lubbock Railway
Completed templates continue to arrive weekly. The CASE Team has agreed to
analyze the data to assign weights to the 27 different factors based on actual data
and as an outcome develop a more permanent solution. Preliminary results
already indicate that certain risk fields are indicating higher risk levels such as
presence or lack of signals, number of grade crossings and presence or lack of
wayside hazard detectors. While this analysis is ongoing, ASLRRA and CASE
intend on pursuing grant funding through the soon to be released Freight Rail
Security Grant Program (FRSGP) to help fund the development and
implementation of a more permanent solution, including digitized features to
ease input and to facilitate management decision making. This routing issue will
be one component of a much larger effort designed to help a broad cross section
of our industry stay compliant with safety and security regulations emanating
from both the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and the U.S. Department
of Transportation. We will be seeking a railroad to become the grant applicant
for this worthwhile undertaking. Any railroad interested in participating please
contact Steve Sullivan Sullivan@aslrra.org or Daniel M. Collins at
dcollins@caseexperts.com. Finally, those railroads that have returned completed
templates, thank you very much. For those still in the process we await your
submittals.
Ernest “Ron” Frazier Sr. Esq, is President of Countermeasures Assessment and
Security Experts, Inc. (CASE) and former VP nd Chief of Police for Amtrak.
Daniel M. Collins is a Consultant with CASE and former President of the
Operation Respond Institute. They currently serve as Security Advisors to
ASLRRA.
OPERATIONS & SAFETY BREAKOUT TRACK TOPICS:
Check out the great educational sessions that have been planned for the
Operations and Safety Track at the upcoming Annual Convention.
Track 601: Keep ‘Em Safe – Installing Traffic Safety Devices While
Working at Highway-Rail Grade Crossings Can Save Lives
National statistics indicate there is a strong prevalence of serious injuries and
fatalities for personnel working on or adjacent to highways. M-O-W and Signal
personnel often perform work at highway-rail grade crossings and knowing the
proper application of warning devices can help reduce the risk of an accident.
Learn how installing adequate signage and traffic diversion devices is important
to minimize the risk of injuries and incidents.
Track 602: Lessons Learned: Putting the Research in Fatigue Management
to Work in the Small Railroad Industry
Alertness and fatigue among railroad workers has been a growing area of
concern given recent regulatory action and the industry’s desire to support an
alert workforce. Extensive research has been performed in the rail industry
regarding alertness/fatigue, but much of this work has been performed with
Class I railroads. Sharing lessons learned from such research and how it can
be applied to ASLRRA members can be important to effectively address this
matter. Dr. Pat Sherry has worked with the rail industry for over 15 years and
has been intimately involved in performing research on fatigue/alertness. Dr.
Sherry is assisting the ASLRRA on fatigue countermeasure initiatives and will
share his expertise in this important area.”
Track 603: An Overview of FRA Accident/Incident Reporting Changes:
What You Don’t Do, Can Cost You
New FRA Accident/Incident Reporting Regulations are going into effect. A
clear understanding of these regulations is important to ensure data is accurately
recorded and to achieve full compliance with the regulation, a key responsibility
of ASLRRA member railroads. This course will cover key information all
reporting officers need to know.
Track 604: Behavioral Based Safety: A Good Fit for Short Lines
Behavioral Based Safety (BBS) is a proven approach to improving safety that
is frequently used in general industry and over the last several years is being
implemented on some Class I railroads. It is a powerful approach to enhance
safety that while not well known in the small railroad industry, it fits well with
the more relational-based approach to safety that is common practice on short
lines. This method supports greater employee ownership and responsibility for
safety. Through measurement, targeting countermeasures at identified unsafe
work practices, peer intervention and tracking of performance the prevalence of
safe work practices are increased. Learn about the principles of BBS and how
it is being implemented on a short line railroad and see if it will work for your
railroad.”
Track 605: Conductor Certification: A Review of the Regulation and Q&A
RR101
The FRA has issued a new regulation that will require that all conductors go
through a certification process. This new regulation will require railroads to
develop a certification program, adjust their training process and document
the process in more detail. Participants will be provided the model ASLRRA –
Conductor Certification Program and the presenter will explain the regulatory
requirements and respond to participant questions.
Track 606: Prompt and Appropriate Response to Accidents & Incidents –
It Could Be Critical to Your Railroad’s Survival
Prompt and appropriate response to accidents and incidents is critical to care of
employees and effective management of risk. Railroads face significant levels of
liability due to accidents/incidents and the proper response may be critical to the
survival of the railroad. Crossing collisions, train accidents and personal injuries
require a prompt response to ensure proper care for any injured individuals and
to effectively manage potential risk to the railroad. This presentation will offer
best practice information and guidance on response to such situations.”
Note to ASLRRA Members: This is a quarterly publication for ASLRRA
members highlighting a timely security or police issue of importance to the small
railroad industry in a concise, readable format. Sponsored by the ASLRRA’s
Police & Security Committee, the publication is distributed via email to keep
ASLRRA members up to date on developments that impact their businesses.
ASLRRA members can view prior issues online by visiting the Documents
section on ASLRRA’s Members’ Only website at: http://members.aslrra.org
Questions or comments about this publication? Please contact:
Steve Sullivan
Vice President & Executive Director
sullivan@aslrra.org
American Short Line and Regional Railroad Association
50 F St., NW, Suite 7020
Washington, DC 20001
202-628-4500
www.aslrra.orgBy Ernest R. Frazier Sr. Esq, President and Daniel M. Collins, Consultant,
Countermeasures Assessment and Security Experts, Inc.
As a result of ASLRRA and FRA discussions held in the fall of calendar year
2010 it became evidently clear – the existing Rail Corridor Risk Management
System (RCRMS) is not a viable risk assessment tool for short line railroads
with only one route. Many of the one route railroads have struggled with
RCRMS in an attempt to become compliant with the Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration regulation entitled “Enhancing Rail
Transportation Safety and Security for Hazardous Materials Shipments” 49 CFR
172.820. In essence RCRMS requires the presence of alternatives routes to make
this decision support tool an effective risk assessment methodology.
In recognition of this problem for a segment of our industry, ASLRRA and
one of its associate members, Countermeasures Assessments and Security
Experts (CASE), approached FRA with an alternative for Class III railroads
with only one route. This approach consisted of a template designed by CASE
incorporating the 27 Risk Factors within RCRMS, but presented in a fashion
more appropriate for railroads possessing only one route. The CASE Team
developed a risk assessment tool that for each of the 27 factors, spread risk over
the range of high-medium-low-and not appropriate. This categorization of risk is
based on CASE’s years of experience in railroad safety and security matters. In
addition Case has gained a level of field risk assessment expertise due to the fact
that CASE has conducted over 20 vulnerability assessments on short line and
regional railroads, where hazardous materials routing is one key risk assessment
component. FRA agreed that the use of this template would satisfy the short
term requirements of RCRMS for these railroads in analyzing risk over their one
and only route.
A template was designed and mailed in November 2010 to ASLRRA member
railroads that possess one route and one interchange (42 railroads) and railroads
with one route and multiple interchanges (28 railroads). Each of these railroads
was asked to fill in the data and when completed, to return a copy to ASLRRA.
As of this publication date, the railroads listed below completed the template and
were gracious enough to return a copy to ASLRRA.
One Route/One Interchange
Interchange
AN Railway, L.L.C.
Company
Central Washington Railroad
Columbia Basin Railroad Co.
Falls Railroad (No TIH)
(No TIH)
Florida Central Railroad Co.
New York & Ogdensburg Railway (No TIH)Green Mountain Railroad (No TIH)
Ohio Valley Railroad Co. (No TIH)
TIH)
San Luis Central Railroad Co.
TIH)
San Pedro & Southwestern Railroad
South Central Tennessee Railroad
Tennessee Southern Railroad Co.
Texas-New Mexico Railroad Company
Valdosta Railway, L.P.
Washington County Railroad Co. (No TIH)
West Texas & Lubbock Railway
Completed templates continue to arrive weekly. The CASE Team has agreed to
analyze the data to assign weights to the 27 different factors based on actual data
and as an outcome develop a more permanent solution. Preliminary results
already indicate that certain risk fields are indicating higher risk levels such as
presence or lack of signals, number of grade crossings and presence or lack of
wayside hazard detectors. While this analysis is ongoing, ASLRRA and CASE
intend on pursuing grant funding through the soon to be released Freight Rail
Security Grant Program (FRSGP) to help fund the development and
implementation of a more permanent solution, including digitized features to
ease input and to facilitate management decision making. This routing issue will
be one component of a much larger effort designed to help a broad cross section
of our industry stay compliant with safety and security regulations emanating
from both the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and the U.S. Department
of Transportation. We will be seeking a railroad to become the grant applicant
for this worthwhile undertaking. Any railroad interested in participating please
contact Steve Sullivan Sullivan@aslrra.org or Daniel M. Collins at
dcollins@caseexperts.com. Finally, those railroads that have returned completed
templates, thank you very much. For those still in the process we await your
submittals.
Ernest “Ron” Frazier Sr. Esq, is President of Countermeasures Assessment and
Security Experts, Inc. (CASE) and former VP nd Chief of Police for Amtrak.
Daniel M. Collins is a Consultant with CASE and former President of the
Operation Respond Institute. They currently serve as Security Advisors to
ASLRRA.
OPERATIONS & SAFETY BREAKOUT TRACK TOPICS:
Check out the great educational sessions that have been planned for the
Operations and Safety Track at the upcoming Annual Convention.
Track 601: Keep ‘Em Safe – Installing Traffic Safety Devices While
Working at Highway-Rail Grade Crossings Can Save Lives
National statistics indicate there is a strong prevalence of serious injuries and
fatalities for personnel working on or adjacent to highways. M-O-W and Signal
personnel often perform work at highway-rail grade crossings and knowing the
proper application of warning devices can help reduce the risk of an accident.
Learn how installing adequate signage and traffic diversion devices is important
to minimize the risk of injuries and incidents.
Track 602: Lessons Learned: Putting the Research in Fatigue Management
to Work in the Small Railroad Industry
Alertness and fatigue among railroad workers has been a growing area of
concern given recent regulatory action and the industry’s desire to support an
alert workforce. Extensive research has been performed in the rail industry
regarding alertness/fatigue, but much of this work has been performed with
Class I railroads. Sharing lessons learned from such research and how it can
be applied to ASLRRA members can be important to effectively address this
matter. Dr. Pat Sherry has worked with the rail industry for over 15 years and
has been intimately involved in performing research on fatigue/alertness. Dr.
Sherry is assisting the ASLRRA on fatigue countermeasure initiatives and will
share his expertise in this important area.”
Track 603: An Overview of FRA Accident/Incident Reporting Changes:
What You Don’t Do, Can Cost You
New FRA Accident/Incident Reporting Regulations are going into effect. A
clear understanding of these regulations is important to ensure data is accurately
recorded and to achieve full compliance with the regulation, a key responsibility
of ASLRRA member railroads. This course will cover key information all
reporting officers need to know.
Track 604: Behavioral Based Safety: A Good Fit for Short Lines
Behavioral Based Safety (BBS) is a proven approach to improving safety that
is frequently used in general industry and over the last several years is being
implemented on some Class I railroads. It is a powerful approach to enhance
safety that while not well known in the small railroad industry, it fits well with
the more relational-based approach to safety that is common practice on short
lines. This method supports greater employee ownership and responsibility for
safety. Through measurement, targeting countermeasures at identified unsafe
work practices, peer intervention and tracking of performance the prevalence of
safe work practices are increased. Learn about the principles of BBS and how
it is being implemented on a short line railroad and see if it will work for your
railroad.”
Track 605: Conductor Certification: A Review of the Regulation and Q&A
RR101
The FRA has issued a new regulation that will require that all conductors go
through a certification process. This new regulation will require railroads to
develop a certification program, adjust their training process and document
the process in more detail. Participants will be provided the model ASLRRA –
Conductor Certification Program and the presenter will explain the regulatory
requirements and respond to participant questions.
Track 606: Prompt and Appropriate Response to Accidents & Incidents –
It Could Be Critical to Your Railroad’s Survival
Prompt and appropriate response to accidents and incidents is critical to care of
employees and effective management of risk. Railroads face significant levels of
liability due to accidents/incidents and the proper response may be critical to the
survival of the railroad. Crossing collisions, train accidents and personal injuries
require a prompt response to ensure proper care for any injured individuals and
to effectively manage potential risk to the railroad. This presentation will offer
best practice information and guidance on response to such situations.”
Note to ASLRRA Members: This is a quarterly publication for ASLRRA
members highlighting a timely security or police issue of importance to the small
railroad industry in a concise, readable format. Sponsored by the ASLRRA’s
Police & Security Committee, the publication is distributed via email to keep
ASLRRA members up to date on developments that impact their businesses.
ASLRRA members can view prior issues online by visiting the Documents
section on ASLRRA’s Members’ Only website at: http://members.aslrra.org
Questions or comments about this publication? Please contact:
Steve Sullivan
Vice President & Executive Director
sullivan@aslrra.org
American Short Line and Regional Railroad Association
50 F St., NW, Suite 7020
Washington, DC 20001
202-628-4500
www.aslrra.org
